HuaweiAscend Y530 Android smartphone. Announced Feb 2014. Features 4.5″ display, Snapdragon 200 chipset, 5 MP primary camera, 1750 mAh battery, 4 GB storage, 512 MB RAM. Qualcomm Adreno 530 vs Intel HD Graphics 5300Qualcomm Adreno 530 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Adreno 530 is an integrated graphics card for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in the last quarter of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 SoC. It supports OpenGL ES and DirectX The GPU uses a still unknown amount of unified shaders clocked at up to 624 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. Compared to the predecessor Adreno 430, the 530 is especially faster in demanding HD Graphics 5300 ► remove from comparisonThe Intel HD Graphics 5300 GT2 is an integrated Broadwell graphics card revealed in late 2014. It can be found in Core M ULV SoCs such as the Core M-5Y70. While the GPU shines with its extremely low power consumption, raw performance is quite low and barely sufficient for modern games. Architecture and Features Broadwell features a GPU based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which has been optimized in various aspects compared to the previous Haswell. Inter alia, the shader arrays called "subslice" have been reorganized and now offer 8 Execution Units EUs each. Three subslices form a "slice" for a total of 24 EUs. Combined with other improvements such as larger L1 caches and an optimized frontend, the integrated GPU has become faster and more efficient than its predecessor. The HD Graphics 5300 represents the mid-range version of the Broadwell GPU family and consists of one slice with 24 EUs. Beyond that, there is also a low-end variant GT1, 12 EUs as well as higher-end models GT3/GT3e + eDRAM, 48 EUs. All Broadwell GPUs support OpenCL and DirectX The video engine can now decode using both fixed function hardware as well as available GPU shaders. Up to three displays can be connected via DP max. 3840 x 2160 60 Hz or HDMI max. 3840 x 2160 24 Hz. HDMI however, is not supported. Performance Depending on the specific CPU, the maximum GPU frequency varies between 800 and 900 MHz. Due to the very low TDP, however, the average clock in 3D applications will be significantly lower. Therefore, the HD 5300 just barely outperforms the old HD 4000 or HD 4200, but requires much less energy for the same performance. Only a few games as of 2014/2015 will run fluently at low settings, Dota 2 or Sims 4. Power Consumption Thanks to a new 14 nm process, the entire Core M chip is specified at just W TDP and is suited for passively cooled tablets. The TDP is flexible and can be reduced or increased, which has a significant impact on in Adreno 530GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / TurboQualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro4 x 2400 MHz? MHz653 MHzQualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM89964 x 2200 MHz? MHz624 MHzmin. - max.? MHz624 - 653 MHzCPU in HD Graphics 5300GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / TurboIntel Core M-5Y712 x 1200 MHz, W300 MHz900 MHzIntel Core M-5Y512 x 1100 MHz, W300 MHz900 MHzIntel Core M-5Y702 x 1100 MHz, W100 MHz850 MHz» show 4 moremin. - - ? MHz624 - 900 MHzBenchmarksPerformance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 5300 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphicsmin 24310 avg 32869 median 32997 4% max 40761 Points min 39138 avg 55907 median 59555 7% max 65380 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphicsmin 19630 avg 24597 median 24597 3% max 29564 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Scoremin 1361 avg 3085 median 3041 3% max 4274 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphicsmin 2895 avg 3862 median 3720 1% max 5512 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Scoremin 327 avg median 407 0% max 620 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphicsmin 352 avg median 439 0% max 671 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphicsmin 27164 avg 35716 median 34405 4% max 48901 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited min 2649 avg 3348 median 3425 18% max 3806 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Graphicsmin 3401 avg 4503 median 11% max 5006 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimitedmin 2252 avg 2605 median 16% max 2893 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Graphicsmin 2488 avg 2996 median 3108 2% max 3253 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Scoremin 498 avg 721 median 731 1% max 973 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPUmin 458 avg 648 median 647 1% max 885 Points 3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel HD Graphics 5300 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. totalmin 2966 avg 3104 median 3104 1% max 3242 Points 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel HD Graphics 5300 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysXmin 2538 avg 2914 median 2% max 3289 Points 3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 5300 3DMark 06min 3951 avg 5044 median 4775 7% max 6754 Points Unigine Heaven - Unigine Heaven DX 11SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + Intel HD Graphics 5300 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03min avg median 1% max fps specvp12 snx-02 + Intel HD Graphics 5300 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02min avg median 0% max fps specvp12 showcase-01 + Intel HD Graphics 5300 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01min avg median 1% max fps specvp12 mediacal-01 + Intel HD Graphics 5300 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01min avg median 0% max fps specvp12 maya-04 + Intel HD Graphics 5300 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04min avg 4 median 4 1% max fps specvp12 energy-01 + Intel HD Graphics 5300 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01min avg median 4% max 9 fps specvp12 creo-01 + Intel HD Graphics 5300 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01min avg median 1% max fps specvp12 catia-04 + Intel HD Graphics 5300 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading 32bit + Intel HD Graphics 5300 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading 32bitmin 2978 avg 4412 median 4018 3% max 6679 Points Cinebench Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 5300 Cinebench - Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 6% max fps Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 5300 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg 19 median 5% max fps Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 5300 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bitmin 98 avg median 98 98% max % GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530 GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16min avg median 56 2% max 88 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 5300 min avg median 1% max fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530 GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16min avg median 88 1% max 96 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 5300 min avg median 55 0% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattanmin 23 avg median 32 9% max 48 fps min avg median 23 6% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattan Offscreenmin 26 avg 43 median 3% max 49 fps min avg median 2% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreenmin avg median 7 1% max 12 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreenmin avg median 1% max 11 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreenmin 12 avg median 15 2% max 19 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreenmin 15 avg median 19 1% max 19 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreenmin avg median 13 0% max 20 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreenmin 14 avg median 19 0% max 20 fps Basemark X - Basemark X High Qualitymin 21420 avg 30602 median 33028 75% max 35449 Points Basemark X - Basemark X Medium Qualitymin 28538 avg 37215 median 38353 85% max 41500 Points LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Room GPUmin 93 avg median 112 1% max 145 Samples/s LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Sala GPUmin 180 avg median 210 0% max 296 Samples/s ComputeMark - ComputeMark Resultmin 460 avg 519 median 1% max 577 Points PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Testsmin 4781 avg 5512 median 6% max 6042 Points PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Testsmin 1913 avg 2183 median 4% max 2461 Points Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming IndexAverage Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 100% n=5Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 5300 → 93% n=5 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation Game BenchmarksThe following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number. low 1280x720 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 low 1280x720 med. 1366x768 low 1280x720 med. 1366x768 low 1280x720 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 low 1024x768 med. 1366x768 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 high 1920x1080 low 1024x768 med. 1366x768 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 low 1280x720 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps low 1366x768 med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps low 1280x720 med. 1366x768 low 1024x768 med. 1366x768 low 1024x768 med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 high 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 med. 1366x768 high 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 11 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 8 fps high 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 3 fps ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 med. 1366x768 high 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 high 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300333439 ~ 35 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300202025 ~ 22 fps high 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300121314 ~ 13 fps ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 med. 1366x768 low 1024x768 med. 1366x768 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 21 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 14 fps high 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 8 fps ultra 1920x1080 low 1280x720 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 15 fps med. 1344x756 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 8 fps high 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 5 fps low 1280x720 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 23 fps high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 17 fps ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 50 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 16 fps high 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 13 fps ultra 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 fps low 1280x720 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1280x720 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 9 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 6 fps high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 4 fps ultra 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 2 fps low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 high 100% Adreno 5300 !30303030565859596060 ~ 43 fps low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps ultra 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 fps low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps low 100% Adreno 5302929303030303030303030 ~ 30 fps high 100% Adreno 5300 !29292930303030303030303048 ~ 29 fps low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 47 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 26 fps ultra 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 13 fps low 1024x768 med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 ultra 1920x1080 low 1280x720 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 28 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 15 fps high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 12 fps ultra 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 3 fps low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 121 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 32 fps high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 19 fps ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 34 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 18 fps high 1366x768 ultra 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 6 fps low high 100% Adreno 5303551 ~ 43 fps low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 high 1366x768 ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 low 1024x768 med. 1366x768 high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 63 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 46 fps high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 29 fps ultra 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 18 fps low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 21 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 16 fps high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 7 fps low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 36 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 23 fps high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 20 fps ultra 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 15 fps low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 43 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 21 fps high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 12 fps ultra 1920x1080 low 1280x720 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 high 1366x768 ultra 1920x1080 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1366x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps low 800x600 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1360x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps low 800x600 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1360x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps ultra 1920x1080 low 800x600 med. 1360x768 high 1600x900 low 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps med. 1366x768 high 1366x768 low 800x600 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 40 fps med. 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 19 fps high 1366x768 low 800x600 HD Graphics 5300 fps high 1360x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps ultra 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 fps low 640x480 high 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 fps ultra 1920x1080 HD Graphics 5300 fps low 800x600 med. 1024x768 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 41 fps high 1280x1024 HD Graphics 5300 ~ 22 fps ultra 1920x1080 Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 100%Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming 15. 0633520 checking url part for id 7062 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 5939 +0s ... 0s 2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 111425 +0200 + ... 4 composed specs + ... 5 did output specs +0s ... 6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7062 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 7062 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5939 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 5939 + ... 11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 14 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 16 Got 597 rows for game benchmarks. + ... 17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 18 got data and put it in $dataArray + ... 19 benchmarks composed for output. + ... 20 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 21 return log + ... Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 Update 2017-09-11
\n \n \n\nhp gpu adreno 530
Specificationsof the Qualcomm Adreno 530 graphics card dedicated to the smartphone sector, it has 2 execution units, with 256 shading units, its maximum frequency is 0.7GHz The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the quantity of texture mapping units, of render output units, the release date, the GFLOPS performance, the values obtained in the benchmark platforms.
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
Earlyprocessor benchmarks didn't wipe out the competition, but maybe the new Adreno 530 GPU could impress. Qualcomm promised a 40% performance improvement on top of a 40% power reduction over the
The Radeon 530 is a dedicated entry-level graphics card for laptops that was released in 2017. According to AMD, there are several different versions with 384 or 320 shader units and DDR3 or GDDR5 64-bit graphics memory. However, they are not based on one of the newer RX series Polaris chips, but most likely using the same architecture as the Radeon R7 M445 / M440 / M340 / M260 / 8650M / 8590M 384 shader units, 28 nm GCN and M430 / M330 / M230 320 shader units, 28 nm Sun GCN. AMD claims that the clock speed of the Radeon 530 can reach 1,024 MHz. Considering the above, the game performance of the Radeon 530 should fall between the Radeon R7 M440 320 shader units, DDR3, Radeon R7 M460 384 shader units, DDR3 and Radeon R7 M445 320 shader units, GDDR5 see these pages for detailed gaming benchmarks. Graphically intensive games such as Dishonored 2, Call of Duty Infinite Warfare or XCOM 2 should not run smoothly on this GPU. Less demanding games like Overwatch, Fifa 17 with a fast CPU, or Farming Simulator 17, would run well, but using low to medium detail settings. For detailed game benchmarks, visit the pages of the previously linked cards. According to the specs, the DDR3 version could be slower than the Radeon 520, that is specified with 320 shaders and 500 SeriesRadeon 530 384 GHz64 Bit 2250 MHzRadeon 520 320 GHz64 Bit 2250 MHzArchitectureGCNPipelines384 - unifiedCore Speed1024 MHzMemory Speed2250 MHzMemory Bus Width64 BitMemory TypeDDR3, GDDR5Max. Amount of Memory2048 MBShared MemorynoAPIDirectX 12, Shader OpenGL nmFeaturesDirectX 12, Mantle, OpenGL, OpenCL VulkanDate of Link to Manufacturer Page Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Scoremin 486 avg 514 median 497 2% max 559 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphicsmin 424 avg median 443 1% max 490 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphicsmin 69759 avg 105231 median 107458 13% max 136248 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphicsmin 43413 avg 52303 median 49386 7% max 67025 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Scoremin 3749 avg 6603 median 6371 7% max 8707 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphicsmin 6266 avg 8145 median 9210 2% max 9466 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Scoremin 1062 avg 1419 median 1386 0% max 1810 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphicsmin 1224 avg 1579 median 1542 2% max 1990 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphicsmin 56520 avg 67535 median 8% max 89565 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Scoremin 2121 avg 2496 median 2508 4% max 2935 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPUmin 2113 avg 2355 median 2327 2% max 2654 Points 3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. totalmin 6283 avg 6338 median 2% max 6392 Points 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysXmin 5074 avg 5369 median 3% max 5663 Points 3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standardmin 16614 avg 17513 median 17513 19% max 18412 Points 3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +3DMark 06min 9517 avg 11377 median 11481 16% max 13132 Points Unigine Valley - Unigine Valley DXmin avg median 2% max fps Unigine Heaven - Unigine Heaven DX 11min avg 17 median 17 6% max fps Unigine Heaven - Unigine Heaven OpenGLmin avg median 6% max fps Unigine Heaven - Heaven highmin avg 20 median 20 4% max fps Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading 32bit +Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading 32bitmin 5166 avg 7436 median 7731 5% max 9411 points Cinebench Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench - Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 10% max fps Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 11% max fps Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bitmin avg 98 median 98 98% max 98 % GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16min avg median 3% max fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16min avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattanmin avg median 12% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattan Offscreenmin avg median 3% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreenmin avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreenmin avg median 0% max fps LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Room GPUmin 189 avg median 1% max 222 Samples/s LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Sala GPUmin 353 avg median 1% max 420 Samples/s ComputeMark - ComputeMark Resultmin 741 avg 992 median 895 1% max 1341 points Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *min 43 avg median 12% max 58 Watt Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiencymin avg median 13% max Points per Watt Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Points per Watt 15% Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultraClock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance Game BenchmarksThe following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested BenchmarksVery Low Overall Quality DX11 1920x1080 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested BenchmarksLowest Preset 1920x1080 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested BenchmarksLow Preset TAA 1920x1080 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Nahberikut ini adalah update 10 daftar urutan tingkatan GPU dan Prosesor HP Android Terbaik dari yang terendah sampai yang tertinggi terbaru 2019 berdasarkan hasil benchmark untuk tablet maupun smartphone android. CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 dengan GPU Adreno 530; CPU Apple A9 dengan GPU PowerVR GT7600; CPU Exynos 8890 dengan GPU Mali T880MP12 A Radeon 530 é uma placa de vídeo dedicada de nível de entrada para portáteis, que foi lançada em 2017. De acordo com a AMD, existem várias versões diferentes com 384 ou 320 unidades shader e memória gráfica DDR3 ou GDDR5 de 64 bits. No entanto, elas não se baseiam em um dos novos chips Polaris da série RX, mas provavelmente usam a mesma arquitetura que a Radeon R7 M445 / M440 / M340 / M260 / 8650M / 8590M 384 unidades shader, GCN de 28 nm e M430 / M330 / M230 320 unidades shader, 28 nm Sun GCN. A AMD afirma que a velocidade da Radeon 530 pode atingir o anterior, o desempenho de jogos da Radeon 530 deve cair entre a Radeon R7 M440 320 unidades shader, DDR3, Radeon R7 M460 384 unidades shader, DDR3 e Radeon R7 M445 320 unidades shader, GDDR5 veja estas páginas para benchmarks de jogos detalhados. Jogos graficamente intensivos, como Dishonored 2, Call of Duty Infinite Warfare or XCOM 2 não devem rodar fluentemente com esta GPU. Jogos menos exigentes, como Overwatch, Fifa 17 com uma CPU rápida, ou Farming Simulator 17, funcionariam bem, mas usando configurações de detalhes de baixas a médias. Para benchmarks de jogos detalhados, visite as páginas das placas anteriormente vinculadas. De acordo com as especificações, a versão DDR3 pode ser mais lenta do que a Radeon 520, especificada com 320 shaders e 500 SerieRadeon 530 384 GHz64 Bit 2250 MHzRadeon 520 320 GHz64 Bit 2250 MHzArquiteturaGCNPipelines384 - unificadoVelocidade do núcleo1024 MHzVelocidade da memória2250 MHzLargura do Bus de Memória64 BitModelo de memóriaDDR3, GDDR5Max. quantidade de memória2048 MBMemória compartilhadanãoAPIDirectX 12, Shader OpenGL nmCaracterísticasDirectX 12, Mantle, OpenGL, OpenCL VulkanData do Link à página do Fabricante Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time SpyAMD Radeon HD 8180...Intel UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EUAMD Radeon R8 M365DXAMD Radeon Pro WX 3100...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Scoremin 486 avg 514 median 497 2% max 559 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphicsmin 424 avg median 443 1% max 490 Points Intel UHD Graphics 605...AMD Radeon R7 M360Intel UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EUAMD Radeon R7 M445AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000/3000Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphicsmin 69759 avg 105231 median 107458 13% max 136248 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphicsmin 43413 avg 52303 median 49386 7% max 67025 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Scoremin 3749 avg 6603 median 6371 7% max 8707 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphicsmin 6266 avg 8145 median 9210 2% max 9466 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Scoremin 1062 avg 1419 median 1386 0% max 1810 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphicsmin 1224 avg 1579 median 1542 2% max 1990 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphicsmin 56520 avg 67535 median 8% max 89565 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Scoremin 2121 avg 2496 median 2508 4% max 2935 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPUmin 2113 avg 2355 median 2327 2% max 2654 Points ...AMD FirePro W4190MAMD FirePro W4170MNVIDIA Quadro K620M...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. totalmin 6283 avg 6338 median 2% max 6392 Points 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysXmin 5074 avg 5369 median 3% max 5663 Points ...AMD Radeon R7 M360Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs Tiger Lake-H...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standardmin 16614 avg 17513 median 17513 19% max 18412 Points ...ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +3DMark 06min 9517 avg 11377 median 11481 16% max 13132 Points Unigine Valley - Unigine Valley DXmin avg median 2% max fps Unigine Heaven - Unigine Heaven DX 11min avg 17 median 17 6% max fps Unigine Heaven - Unigine Heaven OpenGLmin avg median 6% max fps Unigine Heaven - Heaven highmin avg 20 median 20 4% max fps Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading 32bit +Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading 32bitmin 5166 avg 7436 median 7731 5% max 9411 pontos Cinebench Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench - Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 10% max fps Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 11% max fps Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bitmin avg 98 median 98 98% max 98 % GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16min avg median 3% max fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16min avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattanmin avg median 12% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattan Offscreenmin avg median 3% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreenmin avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreenmin avg median 0% max fps LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Room GPUmin 189 avg median 1% max 222 Samples/s LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Sala GPUmin 353 avg median 1% max 420 Samples/s ComputeMark - ComputeMark Resultmin 741 avg 992 median 895 1% max 1341 pontos Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *min 43 avg median 12% max 58 Watt Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiencymin avg median 13% max Points per Watt Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Points per Watt 15% Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultraClock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark - Gama de valores benchmark para essa solução gráfica - Média de valores benchmark para essa solução gráfica* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance Benchmarks de jogosOs seguintes benchmarks têm origem em nossos benchmarks de portáteis de análise O desempenho depende da memória gráfica utilizada, frequência, processador, configurações do sistema, controladores, e sistemas operacionais. Assim os resultados não tem que representantes para todos os portáteis com esta GPU. Para informações detalhadas sobre os resultados de benchmark, clique no número de fps. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados ultra. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks BenchmarksVery Low Overall Quality DX11 1920x1080 baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks BenchmarksLowest Preset 1920x1080 baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks BenchmarksLow Preset TAA 1920x1080 baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados BenchmarksMedium Preset 1366x768 baixo 1280x720 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados alto. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 TheAdreno GPU driver associates a private device structure ("process_priv") with each KGSL file descriptor, which holds the page tables that are used for GPU context switching Adreno 640 inside the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 is the first phone SoC to feature updateable GPU drivers from the Google Play Store Adreno 660 inside the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 is the first phone SoC to feature Variable The Adreno 530 Graphics Processor powers smartphones that run on the Snapdragon 820 and 821 Mobile Platforms. It is currently the 2nd most powerful Mobile GPU by Qualcomm after Adreno 540 of Snapdragon 835. This GPU is perfect for Gaming and Rendering on Smartphones. Some of the most popular flagship devices of 2016 like OnePlus 3T, Mi 5, LG G5, Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, Google Pixel, and HTC U Ultra are using this GPU. First of all, we will have a look at the specification of this GPU, and then we will move onto the Benchmark Scores. Then we will have a look at some of the gameplay videos of then I’ll share my review and opinion of this Graphics Processing Unit. So, let’s head over to the specifications. Recommended Article Snapdragon 835 vs Snapdragon 821 Which one is Better? Contents1 Specification2 Benchmark Score3 Gaming Performance4 Adreno 530 Review5 Final Words and Suggestions Name Adeno 530 Manufacturer Qualcomm Type Mobile GPU Manufacturing Process 14nm FinFET Used In Snapdragon 820/821 Clock Rate 510/624/650 MHz GFLOPS 407/498/519 Direct3D 12 Vulkan Support Yes, OpenGL DirectX Version Adreno 530 GPU is an Integrated Graphics Processor of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 and Snapdragon 821 System-on-chips SOCs. It uses the 14nm FinFET fabrication which makes it more power-efficient than its predecessor Adreno 430. This GPU supports Vulkan Graphics Rendering API which is also implemented in Android Nougat. It supports DirectX Version and Direct3D Version 12. The OpenGL version is Adreno 530 has multiple variants which differ in the clock speed and GFLOPS. Benchmark Score GFXBench Source GFXBench These scores are taken using GFXBench on OnePlus 3T which is powered by the Snapdragon 821 Chipset. There are three separate tests on Manhattan. T-Rex, and Tessellation. Manhattan manages an average FPS on 47 while in T-Rex it is close to 60. Visit the GFXBench Official Website for more Benchmark Scores. 2. PassMark 3D Graphics Mark Adreno 540 vs. 530 Source PassMark In this test, we have compared Snapdragon 835 devices with 821/820 ones using the PassMark Benchmarking Tool. The PassMark 3D Graphics Mark Test gives a rough idea of the GPU’s performance. OnePlus 5 and Samsung Galaxy S8 are running on Adreno 540 GPU, and their scores are pretty close, 3,000+. While the Mi 5s, OnePlus 3T and Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge’s scores vary between 2,000 to 2,500. Even though they have the same GPU, there are many other factors in a smartphone that can have an impact on the performance. Adreno 540 GPU of Snapdragon 835 is much ahead, and I’ll recommend you to go for the same. Gaming Performance Mi 5 Gaming Performance Snapdragon 820 2. OnePlus 3T Gaming Performance Snapdragon 821 The credits for these videos goes to GeekyRanjit for doing the Gaming Review of OnePlus 3T and Mi 5. Make sure to subscribe his YouTube Channel at GeekyRanjit. In the above videos, he tried out some of the popular Android Games like Nova 3, Asphalt 8 Airborne, Implosion, Mortal Combat, Dragon Hunter 5, and Driver Speedboat. Most of the Games did great however there were a few issues with Asphalt 8. There were frame drops and heating issues in both OnePlus 3T and Mi 5 while playing Asphalt 8. But I don’t think that it has anything to do with performance; it’s more likely to be an optimization issue. Asphalt 8 is a 4-year old game, and that could be a reason for poor performance. There were similar Optimisation issues in case of Adreno 510 as well, but Adreno 506 did handle all the games pretty well. Adreno 530 Review Well, honestly speaking, there’s not much to review here. A flagship GPU that can run every single Android Game without any frame drops or throttling issues deserves five stars. While giving a review of a low-budget product, it is necessary to address every single issue and cases where the product won’t perform as per expectation. But when it comes to flagships products, things get easier and straight forward. The only issue I’ve observed so far is with Asphalt 8 which had some frame drops. So, if you’re a big fan of Asphalt 8, then you should better avoid this GPU. Snapdragon 835 Adreno 540 will still be a better choice than Snapdragon 820/821 Adreno 530. But I can assure you to that if you plan to use a Snapdragon 820/821 device for next 2-3 years, it won’t disappoint you. Before purchasing a device, the CPU and GPU performance shouldn’t be your only concern. Look at every specification, research and watch reviews by top Tech YouTubers before making a choice. Some of the Snapdragon 820/821 do a fantastic job while the ones like Lenovo Zuk Z2 has way too many bugs and issues. Final Words and Suggestions There are of course better GPUs in the market like Mali-G71 and Adreno 540. Even mid-ranged Graphics Processors like Adreno 506 are good enough to handle high demanding games. There are still years to come when mid-ranged, and low-end Mobile Phones will have difficulties in playing performance-hungry games. The problem is that we currently do not have the content that can cause trouble for Smartphone GPUs. This situation is so unlike the PC Games where getting a GTX 1080 Ti is essential to get the best Gaming Experience at 4K Resolution. Concluding everything, I would like to suggest that as Snapdragon 835 is already out there, I would recommend you to go for it rather than Snapdragon 820/821. The 10nm Fabrication and Kryo 280 Cores are definitely worth the extra bucks. However, if you’re strict on the budget, you can consider a Snapdragon 821/820 device as well; there won’t be any issues. If you would like to know the difference between Snapdragon 835 and 821, head over to Snapdragon 835 vs. 821 List of Phones which have Adreno 530 GPU Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Snapdragon Variant Xiaomi Mi 5 Xiaomi Mi 5s OnePlus 3 OnePlus 3T Xiaomi Mi Mix Xiaomi Mi Note 2 LeEco Max 2 Lenovo Zuk Z2 LG G5 Moto Z Force Google Pixel Google Pixel XL Asus Zenfone 3 Deluxe LG G6 ZTE Nubia Z11 Sony Xperia XZ HTC 10

2016 64 bit, quad-core, 32 Kbyte I-Cache, 32 Kbyte D-Cache, 1536 Kbyte L2, 14 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 530 GPU | All details | Add to compare. Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 Lite. 2015, 64 bit, quad-core, 32 Kbyte I-Cache, 32 Kbyte D-Cache, 1536 Kbyte L2, 14 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 530 GPU

Adreno™ Graphics Processing UnitsGraphic-intensive games, animations and apps have become an important part of mobile experiences. That’s why the all-in-one design of the Snapdragon processor includes the Qualcomm Adreno™ graphics processing unit GPU. The Adreno GPU accelerates the rendering of complex geometries to deliver high-performance graphics and a rich user experience with low power consumption. If your users think your mobile UI, games and advanced graphics applications look good now, wait until they’ve seen them on the Snapdragon processor with the Adreno how you can improve graphics in your apps without trading off battery life by having a look at our videos on hardware and rendering with the Adreno GPU. Then start optimizing your graphics, gaming and heterogeneous computing applications with the Adreno GPU 530 GPUThe Adreno 530 GPU is embedded into the Snapdragon 820 processor. Adreno 530 GPU offersIn comparison with the predecessor Adreno 430 GPU*Up to 50% better graphics performanceUp to 40% more power efficientUp to 40% faster General-Purpose GPU GPGPU performanceAdvanced API support, including OpenGL ES to help enable more-complex and more-efficient mobile 3D graphics for apps and will be the first GPU to support new Vulkan API. Vulkan enables the next generation of graphics performance by adding multi-threaded command buffer generation and explicit control of advanced graphics capabilities within Snapdragon’s Adreno GPUsShared Virtual memory that enables simultaneous data sharing between the OpenCL host and the API SupportQualcomm is on the Board of Promoters for Khronos Group. Its subsidiary, Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. QTI, has announced support for Vulkan™ starting with the Adreno 530 GPU in the Snapdragon 820 processor. Qualcomm is also announcing upcoming support for Vulkan in QTI’s developer tools, including Snapdragon Profiler and the Adreno SDK. Qualcomm will also be releasing a community edition of user-mode Vulkan driver binaries for Adreno A4xx and A5xx GPUs† soon. You can use these tools with the Vulkan API as part of the process of optimizing your apps for commercial devices powered by the Snapdragon 820 430 GPUAdreno 430 GPU is embedded into the Snapdragon 810 processors and offersSupport for console-quality graphics features – such as enhanced lighting and shading; realistic faces and animation; and deeper 3D detail through hardware tessellation and geometry shaders – at up to Ultra HD resolutionUp to 30% improvement in graphics performance over predecessor Adreno 420 GPU*Up to 20% improvement in power efficiency over predecessor Adreno 420 GPU*Up to 100% faster General-Purpose GPU GPGPU performance over predecessor Adreno 420 GPUDynamic hardware tessellation designed to support visually realistic scenes, with lower memory use and lower power consumptionAdvanced API support, including OpenGL ES and DirectX to help enable more-complex and more-efficient mobile 3D graphics for apps and gamesSupport for new OpenGL ES features like compute shadersSupport for the Android Extension Pack, which includes compute, tessellation and geometry shaders for compatibility with new gaming consoles and GPU FamilyAdrenoSnapdragon ChipsetAPIsSample of Commercial DevicesOpenGL ESOpen CLRenderScriptDirect X200Snapdragon Sony,HTC203Snapdragon 200HTC Desire 516, LG W5, Sony Falcon DS205Snapdragon S2HTC, Samsung220Snapdragon S3HTC Droid DNA225Snapdragon S4HTC Desire500, HTC Desire600, SamsungGT-i8550 Galaxy Win302Snapdragon Embedded 400Samsung, HTC, Motorola, Sony,305Snapdragon 400Samsung, HTC, Sony306Snapdragon 410Samsung, HTC, Sony320Snapdragon 600SamsungGS4, HTC One, LG G, Amazon Fire TV330Snapdragon 800Samsung GS5, Sony Z2, LG G Pro2330Snapdragon 801Sony Xperia Z2, HTC One M8, Gionee330Snapdragon 610HTC, Samsung405Snapdragon CS, GS & Full Samsung418Snapdragon 808420Snapdragon 805Samsung S5, Pantech430Snapdragon CS, GS & TS OnePlus 2, ZTE Axon Pro, HTC One M9, LG G Flex2530Snapdragon GS & Full ProfileYesTBDTBD * Source Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. data.† Product is based on a published Khronos Specification, and is expected to pass the Khronos Conformance Testing Process when available.
ProsesorQuad Core dengan kecepatan 2,4 GHz tersebut akan disandingkan dengan pengolah grafis GPU Adreno 530 650 MHz yang pastinya akan memberikan sensasi Selain prosesor yang mumpuni, Asus Zenfone 3 Deluxe juga mengusung fitur terkini seperti dukungan sensor pemindai sidik jari, USB-C, dan berjalan dengan antar muka ZenUI terbaru yang berbasis
Results Compare The Benchmark News About Us Follow GFXBench GFXBench OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A Onscreen131 Frames Fps OffscreenFailed / Not supported Onscreen648 Frames Fps Offscreen1108 Frames Fps OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A Onscreen1061 Frames Fps Offscreen1601 Frames Fps OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A OnscreenN/A OffscreenN/A N/A 4081 mB PSNR N/A 4081 mB PSNR N/A Failed / Not supported N/A Failed / Not supported
\n \n \n\n hp gpu adreno 530
TheAdreno 530 has the kind of standards support you'd expect of a high-end GPU in 2016 - Miracast 4K30, HDMI 2.0 at 4K60, the new Vulkan graphics API slated for support in Android, OpenGL ES 3.1
The Qualcomm Adreno 530 is an integrated graphics card for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in the last quarter of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 SoC. It supports OpenGL ES and DirectX The GPU uses a still unknown amount of unified shaders clocked at up to 624 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. Compared to the predecessor Adreno 430, the 530 is especially faster in demanding in Adreno 530GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / TurboQualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro4 x 2400 MHz? MHz653 MHzQualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM89964 x 2200 MHz? MHz624 MHzmin. - max.? MHz624 - 653 MHzBenchmarks3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphicsmin 24310 avg 32869 median 32997 4% max 40761 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited min 2649 avg 3348 median 3425 18% max 3806 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Graphicsmin 3401 avg 4503 median 11% max 5006 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimitedmin 2252 avg 2605 median 16% max 2893 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Graphicsmin 2488 avg 2996 median 3108 2% max 3253 Points GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16min avg median 56 2% max 88 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16min avg median 88 1% max 96 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattanmin 23 avg median 32 9% max 48 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattan Offscreenmin 26 avg 43 median 3% max 49 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreenmin avg median 7 1% max 12 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreenmin avg median 1% max 11 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreenmin 12 avg median 15 2% max 19 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreenmin 15 avg median 19 1% max 19 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreenmin avg median 13 0% max 20 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreenmin 14 avg median 19 0% max 20 fps Basemark X - Basemark X High Qualitymin 21420 avg 30602 median 33028 75% max 35449 Points Basemark X - Basemark X Medium Qualitymin 28538 avg 37215 median 38353 85% max 41500 Points PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Testsmin 4781 avg 5512 median 6% max 6042 Points PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Testsmin 1913 avg 2183 median 4% max 2461 Points Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance Game BenchmarksThe following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number. high » With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high. low high » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low high » With most tested laptops playable in detail settings more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming 15. 0441040 no ids found in url should be separated by "_" +0s ... 0s 1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 111425 +0200 + ... 3 composed specs + ... 4 did output specs +0s ... 5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 6 getting avg benchmarks for device 7062 + ... 7 got single benchmarks 7062 + ... 8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 9 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 10 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 11 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 12 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 13 Got 41 rows for game benchmarks. + ... 14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 15 got data and put it in $dataArray + ... 16 benchmarks composed for output. + ... 17 return log + ... Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 530 graphics card LG G7 Fit Smartphone ReviewFor years, LG has been releasing its flagship smartphones under its G-series branding. The South Korean company is now filling out the series with midrange devi...Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro Qualcomm Adreno 530 156 g ZTE Axon M Smartphone ReviewWill that work? ZTE delivers the first "foldable" smartphone. While we would have imagined something else, the statement is right in principle. With its two dis...Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro Qualcomm Adreno 530 230 g Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL Smartphone ReviewEnhanced Reality. Asus's ZenFone AR combines Augmented Reality with Virtual Reality it is, after all, the first smartphone ever certified for Google Tango as w...Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro Qualcomm Adreno 530 170 g HP Elite x3 Phablet incl. Lap Dock ReviewBusiness racer. HP is the only manufacturer offering a premium device with Windows 10 Mobile, which is mainly targeted towards business customers. Besides a lar...Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 Qualcomm Adreno 530 195 g Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 Tablet ReviewOne for everything. It has been quite a while since Samsung has upgraded its premium tablet. We were therefore eager to see how the new device, which is equippe...Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 Qualcomm Adreno 530 434 gHTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg Review » HTC U Ultra Smartphone Review Xiaomi Mi 5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg Review » Xiaomi Mi 5s Smartphone Review LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg Review » LG G6 Smartphone Review Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg Review » Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL Smartphone Review Xiaomi Mi Mix Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg Review » Xiaomi Mi Mix Phablet Review BlackBerry DTEK60 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg Review » BlackBerry DTEK60 Smartphone Review OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg Review » OnePlus 3T Smartphone Review Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg Review » Sony Xperia XZ Smartphone Review ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg Review » ZTE Axon 7 Smartphone Review Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg Review » Google Pixel XL Smartphone Review Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg Review » Lenovo Moto Z Smartphone Review Lenovo ZUK Z2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg Review » Lenovo ZUK Z2 Smartphone Review Xiaomi Mi 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg Review » Xiaomi Mi 5 Smartphone Review OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg Review » OnePlus 3 Smartphone Review Review » OnePlus 3 Smartphone First Impressions HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg Review » HTC 10 Smartphone Review LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg Review » LG G5 Smartphone Review LG G Pad 5 inch Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » LG G Pad 5 inch LG G7 Fit Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » LG G7 Fit Asus Zenfone V V520KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Asus Zenfone V V520KL ZTE Axon M Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » ZTE Axon M LeEco Le Pro3 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » LeEco Le Pro3 Elite LG G6 Plus H870DSU Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » LG G6 Plus H870DSU LG Q8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » LG Q8 ZTE Axon 7S Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » ZTE Axon 7S Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T820 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T820 Vivo Xplay 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » Vivo Xplay 6 LeEco Le Max 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » LeEco Le Max 2 Samsung W2017 Veyron Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Samsung W2017 Veyron HP Elite x3 Lap Dock Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, 1 kg External Review » HP Elite x3 Lap Dock LeEco Le Pro 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » LeEco Le Pro 3 Sony Xperia XZs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Sony Xperia XZs Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » LG G6 HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » HTC U Ultra Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » Asus ZenFone AR-ZS571KL Lenovo ZUK Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » Lenovo ZUK Edge OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » OnePlus 3T BlackBerry DTEK60 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » BlackBerry DTEK60 Xiaomi Mi Mix Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » Xiaomi Mi Mix Xiaomi Mi Note 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » Xiaomi Mi Note 2 LG V34 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » LG V34 Xiaomi Mi 5S Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » Xiaomi Mi 5S Plus Lenovo ZUK Z2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Lenovo ZUK Z2 Pro Lenovo ZUK Z2 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Lenovo ZUK Z2 Plus Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » Google Pixel XL 2016 Google Pixel 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Google Pixel 2016 Xiaomi Mi5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Xiaomi Mi5s ZTE Nubia Z11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » ZTE Nubia Z11 Lenovo ZUK Z2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Lenovo ZUK Z2 Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Lenovo Moto Z LG V20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » LG V20 Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Sony Xperia XZ Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg External Review » Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL HP Elite x3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » HP Elite x3 ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » ZTE Axon 7 Motorola Moto Z Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Motorola Moto Z Force Motorola Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Motorola Moto Z Samsung Galaxy S7 Active Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Samsung Galaxy S7 Active OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » OnePlus 3 HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » HTC 10 Xiaomi Mi 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Xiaomi Mi 5 Pro Xiaomi Mi 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Xiaomi Mi 5 LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » LG G5 Sony Xperia X Performance Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg External Review » Sony Xperia X Performance OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, kg » OnePlus 3 and 3T will now not get – but they will get OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, kg » OnePlus 3 and 3T will now not get – but they will get Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, » Snapdragon 820 benchmarked
43997 USD (Amazon) The Apple M2 GPU is an integrated graphics card offering 10 cores designed by Apple and integrated in the Apple M2 SoC. It uses the unified memory architecture of the M2 SoC A Intel HD Graphics 530 GT2 é uma unidade gráfica integrada, que pode ser encontrada em vários processadores de desktop e portátil da geração Skylake. A versão "GT2" da GPU Skylake oferece 24 Unidades de Execução EUs com velocidade de até 1150 MHz dependendo do modelo da CPU. Devido à falta de memória gráfica dedicada ou cache eDRAM, a HD 530 deve acessar a memória principal 2x 64bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133.DesempenhoO desempenho exato da HD Graphics 530 depende de vários fatores, como TDP, cache L3, memória DDR3/DDR4 e velocidade máxima do modelo específico. As versões de desktop mais rápidas Core i7-6700K podem competir com uma GeForce 920M dedicada e lidará bem com jogos modernos de 2015 com configurações baixas ou motor de vídeo revisado agora decodifica completamente no hardware e, consequentemente, de forma muito mais eficiente que antes. Telas podem ser conectadas via DP 1,3 máx. 3840 x 2160 60 Hz embora o HDMI esteja limitado à versão antiga máx. 3840 x 2160 30 Hz. No entanto, o HDMI pode ser adicionado usando um conversor DisplayPort. Até três telas podem ser controladas de EnergiaA HD Graphics 530 pode ser encontrada em vários processadores de portátil e desktop de diferentes classes de TDP 35 - 91 W.Gen. 9 SerieIris Pro Graphics P580 72 - GHzeDRAM + 64/128 BitIris Pro Graphics 580 72 - GHzeDRAM + 64/128 BitIris Graphics 550 48 - GHzeDRAM + 64/128 BitIris Graphics 540 48 - GHzeDRAM + 64/128 BitHD Graphics 530 24 - GHz64/128 BitHD Graphics 520 24 - GHz64/128 BitHD Graphics 515 24 - 1 GHz64/128 BitUHD Graphics 610 12 - GHz64/128 BitHD Graphics 610 12 - GHz64/128 BitHD Graphics 510 12 - GHz64/128 BitUHD Graphics 605 18 - GHz64/128 BitHD Graphics 505 18 - GHz64/128 BitUHD Graphics 600 12 - GHz64/128 BitHD Graphics 500 12 - GHz64/128 BitCódigoSkylake GT2ArquiteturaGen. 9 SkylakePipelines24 - unificadoVelocidade do núcleo350 - 1150 Boost MHzLargura do Bus de Memória64/128 BitMemória compartilhadasimAPIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL nmCaracterísticasQuickSyncData do CPU in HD Graphics 530GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / TurboIntel Core i7-6700K4 x 4000 MHz, 91 W350 MHz1150 MHzIntel Core i7-67004 x 3400 MHz, 65 W350 MHz1150 MHzIntel Core i7-6920HQ4 x 2900 MHz, 45 W350 MHz1050 MHz» show 14 moremin. - MHz900 - 1150 MHzBenchmarksPerformance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time SpyAMD Radeon HD 8180...AMD Radeon R6 M255DXAMD Radeon R7 M445AMD Radeon R7 M360AMD Radeon R7 Carrizo...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 605...Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel UHD Graphics 605Intel UHD Graphics 610AMD Radeon R4 Stoney RidgeIntel UHD Graphics 615AMD Radeon R6 CarrizoIntel UHD Graphics 617...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphicsmin 72022 avg 80242 median 9% max 88461 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphicsmin 33064 avg 38022 median 33851 5% max 47150 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Scoremin 5731 avg 7593 median 7652 8% max 10384 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphicsmin 6155 avg 7859 median 7500 2% max 10598 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Scoremin 637 avg 876 median 878 0% max 1112 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphicsmin 672 avg 941 median 935 1% max 1202 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphicsmin 49675 avg 69987 median 8% max 93641 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Scoremin 1327 avg 1560 median 1579 2% max 1761 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPUmin 1162 avg 1355 median 1362 1% max 1549 Points ...NVIDIA GeForce 910MAMD Radeon R6 Carrizo...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. totalmin 5376 avg 6414 median 6831 2% max 7036 Points 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysXmin 4345 avg 5173 median 5520 3% max 5653 Points ...AMD Radeon R7 M360Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs Tiger Lake-H...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard...ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5165ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +3DMark 06min 8504 avg 10716 median 11309 16% max 11840 Points SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 +SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01min avg median 1% max fps specvp11 tcvis-02 +SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02min avg median 2% max fps specvp11 sw-02 +SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02min avg median 13% max fps specvp11 proe-05 +SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05min avg median 3% max fps specvp11 maya-03 +SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03min avg median 17% max fps specvp11 lightwave-01 +SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01min avg median 25% max fps specvp11 ensight-04 +SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04min avg median 2% max fps Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading 32bit +Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading 32bitmin 7523 avg 8622 median 8926 6% max 9569 pontos Cinebench Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench - Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg 41 median 15% max fps Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 11% max fps Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bitmin avg median 98% max % GFXBench - GFXBench ManhattanGFXBench - GFXBench Manhattan OffscreenComputeMark - ComputeMark ResultPower Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *min avg median 5% max 39 Watt - Gama de valores benchmark para essa solução gráfica - Média de valores benchmark para essa solução gráfica* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance Benchmarks de jogosOs seguintes benchmarks têm origem em nossos benchmarks de portáteis de análise O desempenho depende da memória gráfica utilizada, frequência, processador, configurações do sistema, controladores, e sistemas operacionais. Assim os resultados não tem que representantes para todos os portáteis com esta GPU. Para informações detalhadas sobre os resultados de benchmark, clique no número de fps. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados alto. baixo 1280x720 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks BenchmarksMedium / Off FXAA 1366x768 baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 4K 3840x2160 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados BenchmarksMedium Preset 1920x1080 baixo 1280x720 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1024x768 média 1366x768 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados média. baixo 1280x720 média 1366x768 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1366x768 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados BenchmarksMedium Render Scale 100 % 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080 baixo 1280x768 média 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1024x768 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1024x768 média 1366x768 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 alto 1366x768 ultra 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados alto. baixo 1366x768 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados média. baixo 1024x768 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 4K 3840x2160 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados Benchmarksmed 1/3 1920x1080 baixo 1280x720 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1024x768 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1024x768 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1024x768 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1024x768 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1024x768 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1024x768 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1024x768 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 baixo 1024x768 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1024x768 média 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 média 1344x756 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Não é jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 alto 1366x768 ultra 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados alto. baixo 1024x768 média 1366x768 .
  • ny99tr3iph.pages.dev/35
  • ny99tr3iph.pages.dev/401
  • ny99tr3iph.pages.dev/355
  • ny99tr3iph.pages.dev/424
  • ny99tr3iph.pages.dev/338
  • ny99tr3iph.pages.dev/209
  • ny99tr3iph.pages.dev/325
  • ny99tr3iph.pages.dev/360

    • hp gpu adreno 530